Laserfiche WebLink
Essex (County of) <br />Essex's debt burden remains low, as the county has defrayed the issuance of debt through pay -as- <br />you-go financing to fund capital expenditures. Direct debt amounted to 34% of operating revenue at <br />the end of fiscal 2007, or C$37.2 million, compared to 35.6% the previous year. The county does not <br />rely on debt issuance to fund its capital plan: rather, it funds a large portion of capital expenditures <br />through a 1.5 % annual increase in the county levy. As a result, we don't expect Essex's debt level, on a <br />stand -alone basis, to increase greatly as a result of the capital expenditure plan; direct debt, on a stand- <br />alone basis, should remain below 30% of operating revenue in the next few years. <br />While the county's stand -alone debt level is low and likely to remain low by peer comparison, debt <br />issuance from its seven lower -tier municipal members indirectly affects its financial profile. Lower -tier- <br />member debt (issued in their own names) necessarily influences the county's own debt - carrying <br />capacity, as the lower -tier members provide for their debt service from the same taxes paid by the same <br />ratepayers. In 2007, the county's combined debt burden (including both the county's own debt and <br />that of its lower -tier members) was noticeably higher than its own debt burden, at about 47.1 % of <br />combined operating revenue, although this was still low by peer comparison. Because the lower -tier <br />municipalities are responsible for water and sewer infrastructure, a major expenditure among Ontario <br />municipalities in recent years, there is potential for this to create indirect financial pressure on the <br />county. Capital expenditure programs at the lower -tier level will necessitate debt issuance. As a result, <br />we expect the combined burden to rise to slightly more than 65% of combined operating revenue in <br />the next four years. <br />Outlook <br />The stable outlook reflects the expectation that there will be no material increase in the county's debt <br />and that cash and investment balances will remain strong. Standard & Poor's also expects that Essex <br />will continue to produce stable operating results. A dramatic increase in debt at the lower -tier level or a <br />major economic deterioration could lead to a negative ratings action. <br />Table 1 <br />P opu l at i o n su mm a ry* <br />T ota l p opu l at i o n % aged 14 y ea r s o y % aged 65 yea o o M ed i a n age <br />176,642 <br />19.1 <br />13.3 <br />37.5 <br />Economic statistics (% change) <br />2007 <br />2006 <br />2005 <br />2004 2003 <br />Population¶ <br />1.3 <br />1.3 <br />1.3 <br />1.3 1.3 <br />Unemployment rate ( %) <br />9.3 <br />9.0 <br />7.9 <br />9.2 7.2 <br />Assessment base§ <br />0.2 <br />7.8 <br />2.8 <br />13.2 9.6 <br />*Median age is for Essex County; other data is for the county less the separated city of Windsor, ¶Annualized census results for Essex less the City of <br />Windsor. §Includes both unit growth and market value changes. <br />www.standardandpoors.com 3 <br />