Laserfiche WebLink
downloaded social service costs within Essex County on the <br />basis of welfare caseloads rather than weighted assessment. <br />Given that Windsor procures approximately 80% of Region- <br />wide welfare cases and the weighted assessment between Essex <br />County and Windsor is approximately 44/56% respectively, a <br />cost risk to Essex County municipalities exists should Windsor <br />be successful in the arbitration favouring weighted assessment <br />allocation. <br /> ~, thrther .challenge assocmted with ~ocial ~ervice <br />downloading is the volatile nature of those costs that may <br />increase municipal expenditures during economic downtums as <br />welfare and social housing demands intensify. <br /> Despite the funding and service delivery challenges noted <br />above, Essex County does have several budget opportunities <br />that will mitigate somewhat the full cost impact of those items <br />over the medium tenn. A significant funding opportunity in <br />future budget periods is the OMERS pension contribution <br />holiday for Ontario municipalities which has been proposed <br />from August 1, 1998 to December 31, 2001 with a gradual 3- <br />year contribution phase-in thereafter. With Essex County's <br />notable reduction in municipalities, from twenty-one to seven <br />over a two-year period, there is the potential for substantial <br />amalgamation savings. Lastly, a more modest cost opportunity <br />will likely be found in mortgage savings upon renewal <br />(mortgage rollover) of social housing units. <br /> CBRS will review the status of the municipality's <br />challenges and exposures, including the funding of temporary <br />revenue sources in future budget periods, and the extent to <br />which the revenue opportunities noted above are realized. The <br />County's financial flexibility and history of prudent fiscal <br />management will serve Essex well during this difficult <br />transition period with the Province. Accordingly, CBRS has <br />maintained it's A rating but will continue to monitor the <br />exposures and challenges articulated earlier as well as the <br />extent to which the Province delegates full control to <br />municipalities with respect to the services for which it has <br />become responsible under the Local Service Re-alignment. <br /> <br />ECONOMIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />The County of Essex is an upper-tier municipality governed by <br />a Council that consists of a Warden and 13 Councillors with <br />Council elections last held in November 1998. <br /> The Essex County economy is influenced significantly by <br />its proximity to the City of Windsor and the U.S. border as well <br />as its status as Ontario's most concentrated automobile <br />assembly location. There exists a very symbiotic relationship <br />between the City of Windsor and Essex County municipalities <br />as residents of those entities cross local borders for <br />employment purposes. For example, it is estimated that 40% of <br />the non-Windsor Essex County workforce is employed within <br />the City of Windsor. <br /> Given that inter-twined relationship noted above, CBRS <br />believes that an economic review should capture the broad <br />regional dynamics of Essex County in aggregate. Looking <br />forward, the area benefits from its competitive tax rates, <br />proximity to the large U.S. and Southern Ontario commercial <br />markets, strong water, air, rail and roadway transportation <br />links, including potential benefits from the NAFTA <br />superhighway and low Canadian dollar which provides <br />competitive advantages to export based manufacturers. <br /> Essex County and the City of Windsor share a common <br />economic development perspective with an understanding that <br />attracting new business takes place from a broad regional level <br />to best meet the needs of prospective entrants. That perspective <br />supports our analysis that a strong regional economy is <br />beneficial for all municipalities in the area. <br /> The main employment industries in Essex County include <br />automobile assembly operations, auto part manufacturing, tool <br /> <br />and die operations, plastic injection moulding, metal stamping <br />activities, large-scale greenhouse operations and traditional <br />farming and agri-business. While Essex County has been <br />successful in diversifying from its core agricultural and <br />automobile dominance, the area would still be adversely <br />impacted by a significant slow-down in demand for those <br />products. In addition, like many Ontario municipalities, the <br />strength of the local economy is heavily reliant on the U.S. <br />market and its demand for Canadian goods and services. <br /> Essex County's 1997 personal income per capita value is <br />4% above the national average and 8% below the provincial <br />average, while consumption, as defined by retail sales per <br />capita is 12% and 9% below national and provincial averages <br />respectively. It should be noted that a lower per capita income <br />figure, by peer comparison, is not necessarily indicative of a <br />lower standard of living since the cost of housing and basis <br />necessities may be a much smaller portion of total income <br />compared to municipalities that have a higher personal income <br />value on an absolute basis. <br /> CBRS's analysis indicates that the broad economic area is <br />able to sustain income levels, both personal and business, so <br />that tax paying ability is not impaired. It is that criteria which <br />is most important in any going-concern municipal economic <br />analysis. The municipality's economic development efforts <br />and its ability to attract new businesses and maintain <br />competitive taxes so that it may expand the assessment base to <br />broaden its tax sources and provide additional revenue support <br />for municipal services and programs should be a key forward <br />looking credit consideration. <br /> <br />FINANCIAL ANALYSIS <br /> <br />County debt and lower-tier debt obligations are unsecured <br />general municipal obligations that rank pari passu and carry no <br />guarantee from any senior level of government. <br /> The County's financial strength is evident by its relatively <br />Iow debt levels, strong reserve funds, low debt service ratio and <br />Solid credit ratios by peer comparison. Reserve fund levels <br />have risen every year since 1986 which enhances financial <br />flexibility and is indicative of the municipality's commitment <br />to internal funding of capital projects and current provisioning <br />for future capital expenditures. While CBRS does not <br />necessarily view reserves as a liquid source of funds from <br />which creditor obligations may be paid, they do enhance a <br />municipality's financial flexibility during periods of revenue <br />and financial constraint. <br />Landfill Financing <br /> In late 1997, Essex County and the City of Windsor <br />completed a financing transaction that is unique among <br />municipalities and provides low-cost, long-term funding for <br />expansion of the area landfill site. A special purpose trust was <br />established and the County leased the land to the trust with the <br />trust subsequently leasing the land back to the County/City. <br />The initial $27 M debt proceeds flow through the trust from <br />investors to the County/City with investors holding <br />participation units in the trust. Tipping fees from the landfill <br />site are recognized as revenue with the Essex/Windsor Solid <br />Waste Authority and remitted to the trust to cover lease <br />payments. Although the risk is remote, to the extent that <br />tipping fees do not cover lease payments, the County/City is <br />required to inject the differential to the trust from general <br />revenue. Funds in excess of lease and dividend obligations stay <br />in the trust. The trust units may be sold on the secondary <br />market and carry capital appreciation/depreciation potential as <br />they are marked to market based on the level of funds in the <br />trust. Since the trust provides very tax advantageous treatment <br />to investors, the financing provided the County/City with <br />4.12% funding over a 34 year tenn. Flexibility exists in the <br />trust for the maturity to conffact or extend .as landfill demand <br />varies. <br /> <br />Page 3 Canadian Bond Rating Sen4ce <br /> <br /> <br />